Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Type of study
Language
Year range
1.
Korean Journal of Blood Transfusion ; : 24-31, 2022.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-926587

ABSTRACT

Background@#Transfusions in pediatrics need to be performed carefully because of various variables, such as the blood volume and immature immune system. As a result, adverse transfusion reactions may appear differently from adults. This study examined the frequency and types of adverse transfusion reactions in pediatric patients. @*Methods@#From January 2018 to December 2021, this study was conducted on 58 children who requested red blood cells, platelets, and plasma blood components from Chungbuk National University Hospital. The frequency and types of adverse transfusion reactions were analyzed retrospectively by reviewing blood transfusion-related medical records and compared with previous studies. @*Results@#Approximately 0.9% of total blood components were transfused into pediatric patients; 1,179 units of blood components were transfused. The number of transfusions for red blood cells, platelets, and plasma was 383, 712, and 84 units, respectively. Among 58 patients, 23 adverse transfusion reactions were observed in 15 (25.9%) patients. Of these, 18 were febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions, and five were allergic transfusion reactions. Febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions occurred in 66.7% of cases with red blood cells, and allergic transfusion reactions occurred with platelets in 60% of cases. @*Conclusion@#This paper reported the incidence and types of adverse transfusion reactions in pediatric patients. This is expected to be more frequent in pediatric patients than adults, but most of them were relieved by supportive treatment because the symptoms were mild. As the awareness of hemovigilance is still low, it is essential to recognize and deal with adverse transfusion reactions through continuous education.

2.
Korean Journal of Blood Transfusion ; : 163-173, 2021.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-917540

ABSTRACT

Background@#Pretransfusion testing is vital for safe transfusion. However, in situations without time to perform sufficient testing, all or part of the pretransfusion testing may be skipped to issue blood quickly. This study evaluated the safety of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion released by an emergency blood transfusion protocol through retrospective analysis at a tertiary hospital for eight years. @*Methods@#All RBC transfusions following the emergency blood transfusion protocol from 2011 to 2018 at Seoul National University Hospital were included in the study. Crossmatching and unexpected antibody screening test results conducted after RBC release and the occurrence of hemolytic transfusion reactions were analyzed. @*Results@#A total of 1,541 cases (5,299 RBCs issued) of emergency blood transfusion were identified. RBCs were issued after performing the immediate spin crossmatch without an unexpected antibody screening test in most cases (1,443; 93.64%), while RBCs were issued with no pretransfusion testing in 98 cases (6.36%). Antibody screening tests performed after the issue of RBCs showed that 17 (1.1%) cases were positive. Two units of RBCs from two different cases showed positive antiglobulin crossmatch test results. However, none of them were suspected to be associated with a hemolytic transfusion reaction. @*Conclusion@#The incidence of incompatible RBC release was very low in patients receiving RBC transfusion through the emergency blood transfusion protocol suggesting it can be used safely with minimal risk of hemolytic transfusion reactions caused by incompatible blood transfusions.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL